Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola
Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola
377 So. 2d 166; 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4876
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Malone v. Citizens & Peoples National Bank of Pensacola
Opinion of the Court
We find appellants’ constitutional argument to be without merit. See City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 421 U.S. 297, 96 S.Ct. 2513, 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641, 86 S.Ct. 1717, 16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966); Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Co., 296 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1974); Winner v. Westwood, 273 So.2d 151 (Fla. 1970); Rodriquez v. Jones, 64 So.2d 278 (Fla. 1953). We have also reviewed the other issues raised by appellants and find them to be without merit.
The order of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.