In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Keith v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- State v. McKenzie (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
- Small v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
- Franklin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- Woodard v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
- In re Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure (Fla. 1981)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appended to this order is the revised Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.986 relating to uniform judgment and sentence forms.
This Court finds that the uniform application of judgments and sentences is essential to the proper administration of justice in the State of Florida. Thus this Court hereby adopts this revised rule pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(a).
This rule shall govern all proceedings within its scope after midnight, October 31, 1981. This Court respectfully requests that interested parties file any appropriate suggestions or objections on or before December 1, 1981.
The current rule is hereby stricken and the appended language is substituted therefor.
It is so ordered.
APPENDIX
PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR RULE 3.986
RULE 3.986 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
The following uniform judgment and sentence shall be sufficient. Variation from this form does not void the judgment, sentence, and fingerprints that are otherwise sufficient.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.