Mccray v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Mccray v. State, 473 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1985)
10 Fla. L. Weekly 243; 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3036
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, Ehrlich, McDonald, Overton, Shaw
Mccray v. State
Opinion of the Court
We accepted jurisdiction of this case because the district court certified the same question certified in Rotenberry v. State, 429 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), questioning the sufficiency of Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.04(c). Today, we find the instruction adequate in Roten-berry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 and accordingly approve the decision below. 433 So.2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find no merit to the other issues raised by petitioner.
It is so ordered.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissent in Rotenberry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 (Fla. 1985).
SHAW, J., concurs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- George Warren McCRAY v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published