Mccray v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Mccray v. State, 473 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1985)
10 Fla. L. Weekly 243; 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3036
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, Ehrlich, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Mccray v. State

Opinion of the Court

EHRLICH, Justice.

We accepted jurisdiction of this case because the district court certified the same question certified in Rotenberry v. State, 429 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), questioning the sufficiency of Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.04(c). Today, we find the instruction adequate in Roten-berry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 and accordingly approve the decision below. 433 So.2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find no merit to the other issues raised by petitioner.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW, J., concurs.

Dissenting Opinion

ADKINS, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissent in Rotenberry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 (Fla. 1985).

SHAW, J., concurs.

Reference

Full Case Name
George Warren McCRAY v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published