State v. Griffin
State v. Griffin
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially.
I concur because of this Court’s decision in State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985), but I adhere to the views expressed in my dissent therein.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons set forth in Justice Ehrlich’s dissent to State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985).
Opinion of the Court
This is a petition to review Griffin v. State, 474 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), which directly conflicts with our decision in State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. We quash that portion of the
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Florida v. Alphonse GRIFFIN
- Status
- Published