Supreme Court of Florida, 1986

Amendment to the Integration Rule, Article XXII

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 3, 1986 · Adkins, Bark, Boyd, Ehrlich, Ett, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

490 So. 2d 947; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 298; 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2302 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Fla. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It has come to the Court’s attention that an amendment to article XXII of the Integration Rule, the Emeritus Attorneys Pro Bono Participation Program, is required in order to more fully effectuate the purpose of the emeritus attorney program.*

Accordingly, it is the judgment of the Court that article XXII, section (2)(a)(3), is hereby amended to read:

(3) If not a retired member of The Florida Bar, has not failed the Florida Bar examination three or more times; and

This amendment shall be effective immediately.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARK-ETT, JJ., concur.

We have jurisdiction, article V, section 15, Florida Constitution.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.