Supreme Court of Florida, 1986

Florida Bar v. Milan

Florida Bar v. Milan
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided December 24, 1986 · Adkins, Barkett, Boyd, Ehrlich, McDonald, Overton, Shaw
499 So. 2d 829; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 60; 1986 Fla. LEXIS 3007 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Florida Bar v. Milan

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar, respondent’s conditional guilty plea, and the uncontested report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) (conduct contrary to honesty, justice or good morals) of the Integration Rule. The referee recommended a two-year suspension retroactive to November 1, 1982.

We approve the referee’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, respondent is suspended for two years, retroactive to November 1,1982, and must provide proof of rehabilitation upon application for reinstatement to the bar. Judgment for costs in the amount of $300 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.