Naugle v. State
Naugle v. State
511 So. 2d 282; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 330; 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2028
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Riley v. State (Fla. 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:
DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So.2d 130 (Fla. 1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.