Naugle v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Naugle v. State, 511 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1987)
12 Fla. L. Weekly 330; 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2028
Barkett, Ehrlich, Grimes, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Naugle v. State

Opinion of the Court

EHRLICH, Justice.

We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:

DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So.2d 130 (Fla. 1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Steven C. NAUGLE v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published