Supreme Court of Florida, 1988

State v. Cecil

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided January 21, 1988 · Barkett, Ehrlich, Grimes, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

518 So. 2d 919; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 51; 1988 Fla. LEXIS 126; 1988 WL 4376 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Diamond (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
State v. Cecil (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
State v. Filipowich (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Cecil, 508 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), which certified the following question:

Whether the state is precluded from seeking common law certiorari review of non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases.

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have resolved this question in State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1988), which held that the state is not precluded from seeking review of interlocutory orders by common law certiorari. Thus, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, J., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.