Pisano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Pisano v. State, 554 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 1990)
15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 30; 1990 Fla. LEXIS 87; 1990 WL 3847
Barkett, Ehrlich, Grimes, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Pisano v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We accepted Pisano v. State, 539 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), based on apparent conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.

Reference

Full Case Name
Peter PISANO v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published