Supreme Court of Florida, 1990

In re Amendment to the Rules of Judicial Administration

In re Amendment to the Rules of Judicial Administration
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 3, 1990 · Barkett, Ehrlich, Grimes, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw
560 So. 2d 786; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 276; 1990 Fla. LEXIS 641; 1990 WL 61215 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
In re Amendment to the Rules of Judicial Administration

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding has been initiated by the Court for the purpose of adopting an amendment to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration. Art. V, § 2, Fla. Const.; Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.130.

We hereby adopt the following as an additional paragraph in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.030(a)(3):

(D) A retired judge serving on assignment to temporary judicial duty may be *787referred to as a “Senior Judge.” This designation is honorary and has no effect on the responsibilities or conduct of the retired judge.

This new rule shall take effect June 15, 1990. Comments received by June 1, 1990 will be considered prior to the rule’s effective date.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.