Liataud v. State

Supreme Court of Florida September 3, 1992

Liataud v. State, 603 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1992)

17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582; 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1565; 1992 WL 212009

Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992), we quash State v. Liataud, 587 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Liataud’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Jean Max LIATAUD v. STATE of Florida
Status: Published