Forrest v. State

Supreme Court of Florida September 3, 1992

Forrest v. State, 603 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 1992)

17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 583; 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1566; 1992 WL 212011

Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992), we quash State v. Forrest, 588 So.2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), *509and remand with directions to reinstate Forrest’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charlie FORREST v. STATE of Florida
Status: Published