Baumgardner v. State

Supreme Court of Florida September 3, 1992

Baumgardner v. State, 603 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1992)

17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582; 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1569; 1992 WL 212014

Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992), we quash State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Baumgardner’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J, concur. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Todd Russell BAUMGARDNER v. STATE of Florida
Status: Published