Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Florida, 1992

Baumgardner v. State

Baumgardner v. State
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided September 3, 1992 · Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw
603 So. 2d 510; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582; 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1569; 1992 WL 212014 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Baumgardner v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992), we quash State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Baumgardner’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J, concur. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑