Supreme Court of Florida, 1992

Adderly v. State

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided September 24, 1992 · Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

605 So. 2d 459; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 600; 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1625; 1992 WL 236199 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

The Florida Bar v. McHenry (Fla. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We review State v. Adderly, 596 So.2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the court subsequently certified the following question as being of great public importance:

MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?

State v. Adderly, 602 So.2d 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (on motion for rehearing).

Upon the authority of Scales v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1992), we answer the certified question in the affirmative. We quash the decision below and remand with directions to reinstate Adderly’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.