Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Florida December 3, 1992

Hall v. State, 616 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1992)

17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 739; 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2047; 1992 WL 354299

Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Opinion of the Court

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Hall v. State, 588 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the same questions we recently answered in the negative in Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 1992). For the reasons expressed in Tillman, we approve the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, SHAW, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which BARKETT, C.J., concurs.

Dissenting Opinion

KOGAN, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent on the basis of my dissenting opinion in Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 1992). The petitioner has only been convicted of one violent crime and there*415fore cannot be a habitual violent felony offender.

BARKETT, C.J., concurs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Michael Lenard HALL v. STATE of Florida
Status: Published