Federation of Physicians & Dentists v. Chiles

Supreme Court of Florida
Federation of Physicians & Dentists v. Chiles, 613 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 1993)
18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 137; 1993 Fla. LEXIS 291; 1993 WL 54480
Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Federation of Physicians & Dentists v. Chiles

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Petitioner, in the above cause, is hereby denied and the Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondents is denied as moot.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which BARKETT, C.J., and SHAW, J., concur.

Concurring Opinion

KOGAN, Justice,

specially concurring.

I agree that mandamus cannot lie to compel the Governor to take discretionary actions, nor can it lie in the absence of a clear and preexisting legal right, which is absent here. See Florida League of Cities v. Smith, 607 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1992). However, I would dismiss this petition without prejudice for the parties to litigate these same issues in a proper lawsuit under the principles announced in my dissent in State v. Florida Police Benevolent Association, Inc., 613 So.2d 415 (Fla. 1992) (Kogan, J., dissenting).

I reiterate my belief that the majority in Police Benevolent has eviscerated the collective bargaining guarantee of article I, section 6, Florida Constitution, as it affects public employees. This has stripped every public employee in this state of any meaningful right to bargain collectively.

BARKETT, C.J., and SHAW, J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
FEDERATION OF PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees v. Lawton CHILES, Governor, State of Florida, Florida House of Representatives and Its Speaker, T.K. Wetherell, and The Florida Senate and Its President, Gwen Margolis
Status
Published