Roth v. State

Supreme Court of Florida February 4, 1993

Roth v. State, 616 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1993)

18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 103; 1993 Fla. LEXIS 222; 1993 WL 22162

Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Roth v. State, 601 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on certified conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), review *12denied, 598 So.2d 78 (Fla. 1992), disapproved, Hayles v. State, 608 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Hayles, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Herman ROTH v. STATE of Florida
Status: Published