Pearson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Pearson v. State, 616 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1993)
18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240; 1993 Fla. LEXIS 607; 1993 WL 101948
Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

Pearson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Pearson v. State, 603 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed to the extent it is inconsistent with Lamont and remanded for reconsideration.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bennie Lee PEARSON v. STATE of Florida
Status
Published