Harriman v. Nemeth
Harriman v. Nemeth
Opinion of the Court
We have for review Nemeth v. Harriman, 586 So.2d 72, 73-74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), in which the Second District Court of Appeal relied on the Third District’s decision in Lloyd ex rel. Lloyd v. North Broward Hospital District, 570 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
It is so ordered.
. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
Concurring Opinion
concurring.
I concur. It may be that four years is too short a time for a statute of repose and the legislature may wish to extend the repose period. I believe, however, that we properly construed the existing statute in Kush v. Lloyd, 616 So.2d 415 (1992).
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I would approve the decision of the court below based on my opinion in Kush v. Lloyd, 616 So.2d 415 (1992) (Barkett, C.J., concurring in part, dissenting in part).
KOGAN, J., concurs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ben B. HARRIMAN, M.D. v. Vickie NEMETH, etc.
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published