Supreme Court of Florida, 1993

Innes v. State

Innes v. State
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 24, 1993 · Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw
620 So. 2d 1233; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 386; 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1085; 1993 WL 219768 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Innes v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Innes v. State, 597 So.2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the district court asserted conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We addressed the issue in this case in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1993). Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with Sirmons.

It is so ordered.

overton, McDonald, shaw, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.

Concurring Opinion

BARKETT, Chief Justice,

specially concurring.

I concur, but with the same reservations I expressed in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1993).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.