Supreme Court of Florida, 1993

State v. Ramos

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided December 16, 1993 · Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw

629 So. 2d 103; 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642; 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1942; 1993 WL 517387 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Ramos (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Coleman v. Coleman (Fla. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Ramos, 608 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

That portion of the district court’s decision that affirmed the trial court’s order dismissing the charges against Lazaro Diaz is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993). The case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.