Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Florida, 1994

M.H. v. State

M.H. v. State
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 24, 1994 · Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, Medonald, Overton, Shaw
633 So. 2d 1067; 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 146; 1994 Fla. LEXIS 406; 1994 WL 92089 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

M.H. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in M.H. v. State, 622 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), on the ground of certified conflict. Art V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

On the authority of our recent decision in Brown v. State, 629 So.2d 841 (Fla. 1994), we *1068quash the decision under review and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Brown.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. MeDONALD, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑