Kahles v. State
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dante Martin v. State of Florida (Fla. 2018)
- State v. De La Llana (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
- Altingeyik v. State (Fla. 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Robert KAHLES, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stacey Pastel Dougan and Diane M. Cuddihy, Asst. Public Defenders, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review State v. Kahles, 644 So.2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), wherein the district court held Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), constitutional. On motion for rehearing, the court certified the issue to this Court. See State v. Kahles, 19 Fla. L. Weekly D2225 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 19, 1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly S186, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Kahles.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.