Supreme Court of Florida, 1995

Polson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 4, 1995 · Anstead, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, Overton, Shaw, Wells

654 So. 2d 127; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 227; 1995 Fla. LEXIS 681; 1995 WL 256221 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pallas v. State (Fla. 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Polson v. State, 636 So.2d 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), wherein the district court relied on Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), to affirm a trial court order finding Florida’s stalking statute, § 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), constitutional. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently reviewed Bouters and found the statute constitutional. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, — So.2d — [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly we approve the district court decision in Poison.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.