specially concurring.

Subject to the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1995) (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with the majority.

We have for review Salatino v. State, 644 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), wherein the district court upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), and certified:

*628Is section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), facially unconstitutional as vague and overbroad?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 8(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1995). Accordingly we approve Salatino on this issue.

It is so ordered.