State v. McInnis

Supreme Court of Florida
State v. McInnis, 686 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 1996)
22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 36; 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2210; 1996 WL 734814
Anstead, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, Overton, Shaw, Wells

State v. McInnis

Opinion of the Court

' SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Mclnnis v. State, 671 So.2d 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), wherein the district court certified as questions of great public importance the same questions before *572this Court in State v. Wilson, 686 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1996), concerning the trial court’s preliminary comments on reasonable doubt. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash Mclnnis based on Wilson.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida v. James McINNIS
Status
Published