State v. Rubin
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Isom v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Sewall v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
- Jordan v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Rubin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Steven RUBIN, et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Petitioner.
Ira N. Loewy of Bierman, Shohat, Loewy, Perry & Klein, P.A., Miami, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Rubin v. State, 697 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), which certified conflict with Hines v. State, 587 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), concerning scoresheet errors. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4).
We resolved this issue in State v. Mackey, 719 So.2d 284 (Fla. 1998), by disapproving a rule of per se reversal in cases involving scoresheet errors. To that extent, we disapproved Mackey and approved Hines. Accordingly, that portion of the district court's decision that applied the per se rule of reversal is quashed. We remand for the Third District's reconsideration of this case in light of our decision in Mackey.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.