State v. M.J.P.
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- C.B. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- MCP v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- CDN v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- State v. EDP (Fla. 1998)
- TC v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- C.D.N. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- State v. E.D.P. (Fla. 1998)
- M.C.P. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- T.C. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We have for review M.J.P. v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2090, — So.2d- (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.3,1997), wherein the district court certified the same question before this court in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1998):
DOES SECTION 924.051(4), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1996), APPLY IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V., § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have already answered this question in the negative in T.M.B. We approve M.J.P.
It is so ordered.
ORDER
The Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification is hereby denied.
WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1998) (order denying rehearing).
PARIENTE, J., concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.