State v. B.D.W.
Supreme Court of Florida
State v. B.D.W., 717 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1998)
23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 216; 1998 Fla. LEXIS 610; 1998 WL 161895
Anstead, Harding, Kogan, Overton, Pariente, Shaw, Wells
State v. B.D.W.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1998) (order denying rehearing).
PARIENTE, J., concurs.
Opinion of the Court
We have for review B.D.W. v. State, 701 So.2d 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), wherein the district court certified the same question before this court in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1998):
DOES SECTION 924.051(4), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1996), APPLY IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V., § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered this question in the negative in T.M.B. We approve B.D.W.
It is so ordered.
ORDER
The Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification is hereby denied.
HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Florida v. B.D.W., a child
- Status
- Published