State v. A.L.W.

Supreme Court of Florida
State v. A.L.W., 717 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1998)
Anstead, Harding, Kogan, Overton, Pariente, Shaw, Wells

State v. A.L.W.

070rehearing

On Rehearing

The Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification is hereby denied.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.

Dissenting Opinion

WELLS, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my opinion dissenting from the denial of rehear*914ing in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1998) (order denying rehearing).

Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review A.L.W. v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2227, — So.2d-, 1997 WL 578660 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.16, 1997), wherein the district court certified the same question before this court in State v. T.M.B., 716 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1998):

DOES SECTION 924.051(4), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1996), APPLY IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V., § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have already answered this question in the negative in T.M.B. We approve A.L.W.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida v. A.L.W., a child
Status
Published