Supreme Court of Florida, 2000

Klarich v. State

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 15, 2000 · Anstead, Harding, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells

760 So. 2d 150; 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484; 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1229; 2000 WL 766599 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Britt v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Klarich v. State, 730 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal that cited as controlling authority Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla. 1981). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000), we approve the decision below and find that the unpreserved sentencing errors in this case do not constitute fundamental error.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.