Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Florida, 2000

Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 22, 2000 · Anstead, Harding, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells
761 So. 2d 318; 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 499; 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1276; 2000 WL 796063 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Johnson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Johnson v. State, 717 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), on the basis of express and direct conflict. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000), we approve the decision below.1

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

. We decline to address the other issues raised by Johnson that are not the basis of our jurisdiction. See, e.g., Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 595 n. 3 (Fla. 1999); McMullen v. State, 714 So.2d 368, 373 (Fla. 1998).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑