Nagel v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nagel v. State, 763 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 2000)
25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 598; 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1453; 2000 WL 963899
Anstead, Harding, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells

Nagel v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Nagel v. State, 789 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), because it cited as controlling authority Goodwin v. State, 721 So.2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla. 1981). We quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings in light of our opinion in Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1999).

It is so ordered.

SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name
Richard NAGEL v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published