Supreme Court of Florida, 2001

Valenzuela v. State

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided November 29, 2001 · Anstead, Harding, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells

803 So. 2d 706; 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791; 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2279; 2001 WL 1511516 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bunkley v. State (Fla. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Valenzuela v. State, 764 So.2d 777, 777 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), a per curiam decision of the First District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority the Third District Court of Ap*707peal’s decision in Bover v. State, 732 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), quashed, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2001). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla. 1981).

In accordance with our opinion in Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2001), we quash the First District’s decision and remand this case to the First District for consideration in light of our recent decisions in Bover and Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173, 1180-81 (Fla. 2001). In remanding this case, we express no opinion as to the merits of Valenzuela’s rule 3.800(a) claim.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.