Gross v. State
Gross v. State
863 So. 2d 167; 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 710; 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1574; 2003 WL 22145384
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gross v. State
Opinion of the Court
We originally accepted jurisdiction of Gross v. State, 820 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), based upon express and direct conflict with Hankin v. State, 682 So.2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). However, we find that the Second District’s recent decision in Cairl v. State, 833 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), resolved the conflict. Therefore, we discharge jurisdiction because the conflict of decisions was resolved.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.