Supreme Court of Florida, 2005

State v. Matheson

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 3, 2005 · Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells

896 So. 2d 748; 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 133; 2005 Fla. LEXIS 381; 2005 WL 487205 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Frost v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Rehm v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
State v. Tanner (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, to review Matheson v. State, 870 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), based on express and direct conflict with Vetter v. State, 395 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, and BELL, JJ., concur. CANTERO, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.