State v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court of Florida June 23, 2005

State v. Rodriguez, 920 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 2005)

30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495; 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1342; 2005 WL 1475362

Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells

Opinion of the Court

WELLS, J.

We have on appeal a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal declaring invalid a state statute. Rodriguez v. State, 906 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Rodriguez also expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Sult v. State, 839 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (3), Fla. Const.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Suit v. State, 906 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 2005), we affirm the decision of the Third District in Rodriguez.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and ANSTEAD, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ„ concur. CANTERO and BELL, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: STATE of Florida v. Alberto RODRIGUEZ
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published