Supreme Court of Florida, 2005

State v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 23, 2005 · Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells

920 So. 2d 624; 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495; 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1342; 2005 WL 1475362 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. O'DANIELS (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

WELLS, J.

We have on appeal a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal declaring invalid a state statute. Rodriguez v. State, 906 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Rodriguez also expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Sult v. State, 839 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (3), Fla. Const.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Suit v. State, 906 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 2005), we affirm the decision of the Third District in Rodriguez.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and ANSTEAD, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ„ concur. CANTERO and BELL, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.