State v. Wightman

Supreme Court of Florida
State v. Wightman, 14 So. 3d 211 (Fla. 2009)
34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 391; 2009 Fla. LEXIS 986; 2009 WL 1884713
Quince, Pariente, Lewis, Canady, Polston, Labarga, Perry

State v. Wightman

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Wightman v. State, 982 So.2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), based on express and direct conflict with State v. Generazio, 691 So.2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and Lazarowicz v. State, 561 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Randolph WIGHTMAN, Respondent
Status
Published