Diaz v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Diaz v. State, 124 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 2012)
37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 742; 2012 WL 5869664; 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2413
Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Diaz v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In Diaz v. State, 65 So.3d 1079, 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of Leduan Diaz’s postconviction motion, which claimed “ineffective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel’s failure to advise him that accepting a plea would subject him to deportation.” We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981). Consistent with our ruling in Hernandez v. State, 124 So.3d 757 (Fla. 2012), we approve the Third District’s decision.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Leduan DIAZ v. STATE of Florida
Status
Published