Diaz v. State
Diaz v. State
124 So. 3d 765; 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 742; 2012 WL 5869664; 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2413
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Diaz v. State
Opinion of the Court
In Diaz v. State, 65 So.3d 1079, 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of Leduan Diaz’s postconviction motion, which claimed “ineffective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel’s failure to advise him that accepting a plea would subject him to deportation.” We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981). Consistent with our ruling in Hernandez v. State, 124 So.3d 757 (Fla. 2012), we approve the Third District’s decision.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.