State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran
135 So. 3d 280; 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122; 2014 Fla. LEXIS 954; 2014 WL 1058134
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Because I would order the trial court to vacate the judgment against State Farm, I would deny Curran’s motion for attorney’s fees and grant State Farm’s Case No. SC12-157 Page 2 motion for attorney’s fees, conditioned upon the trial court’s finding that State Farm is entitled to fees pursuant to its proposal for settlement.
CANADY, J., concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.