Caudell v. Southern Railway Co.
Georgia Court of Appeals
Caudell v. Southern Railway Co., 2 Ga. App. 479 (1907)
58 S.E. 689; 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 431
Hill
Caudell v. Southern Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
Tlie plaintiff having failed to prove his ease as laid, the court should have awarded a nonsuit. The defendant having introduced no testimony, the direction of a verdict in its favor was erroneous. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil Co., 128 Ga. 606, 57 S. E. 879.
The judgment is reversed, with direction 'that in the trial court a judgment of nonsuit be substituted for the judgment rendered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Caudell v. Southern Railway Company
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published