Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.
Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.
3 Ga. App. 295; 59 S.E. 826; 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 625
Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.
Opinion of the Court
1. The failure of the plaintiff in error to file supersedeas bond or pauper affidavit is not ground for dismissal of the writ of error.
2. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the garnishment proceedings; but did err in rendering judgment against the garnishee, for the reasons given in Fagan v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 24 (57 S. E. 1052), and cit., and in Ingram v. Jackson Mercantile Co., 2 Ga. App. 218 (58 S. E. 372). Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.