Georgia Court of Appeals, 1908

Bothell v. Whitley Bros.

Bothell v. Whitley Bros.
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided February 24, 1908 · Hill
3 Ga. App. 755; 60 S.E. 371; 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 423
Bothell v. Whitley Bros.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Hill, C. J.

1. The assignment of error is to a judgment denying a motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds, and is sufficient to reach the said grounds. The motion to dismiss is therefore denied. Rules of Court of Appeals, Rule 8.

. 2. The evidence showing that the plaintiff was the bona fide holder of the acceptances sued on, and that he had received them before maturity and without notice of any defect or defense, it was error to allow testimony in support of a plea of failure of consideration. Civil Code, §3694.

3. The holder of a negotiable instrument indorsed in blank is presumed to be such bona fide and for value. Habersham v. Lehman, 63 Ga. 380.

4. A verdict for the plaintiff was demanded, and a new trial should have been granted. Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.