Georgia Court of Appeals, 1911

Wright v. State

Wright v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided April 11, 1911 · Hill
9 Ga. App. 235; 70 S.E. 968; 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 490

Wright v. State

Opinion of the Court

Hill, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial was “allowed,” but the ground thereof was not approved or verified in any manner by the trial judge, and' will not be considered by this court. Wilson v. Cobb, 4 Ga. App. 272 (61 S. E. 133) ; Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 964); Henderson v. State, 7 Ga. App. 810 (68 S. E. 333); Thornton v. Cordell, 8 Ga. App. 588 (70 S. E. 17).

2. The original motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.