Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki
Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki
11 Ga. App. 9; 74 S.E. 444; 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 229
Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki
Opinion of the Court
1. “Without special authority, attorneys can not receive anything in discharge of a client’s claim but the full amount in cash.” Civil Code (1910), § 4956; Patterson v. Childs, 9 Ga. App. 646 (72 S. E. 45).
2. The court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and entering final judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.