Georgia Court of Appeals, 1912

Smith v. Whelchel

Smith v. Whelchel
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided April 2, 1912 · Hill
11 Ga. App. 45; 74 S.E. 573; 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 250

Smith v. Whelchel

Opinion of the Court

Hill, C. J.

Where one of the animals designated in § 2032 of the Civil Code (1910) has been impounded, as authorized by § 2033, and has subsequently been disposed of by the taker-up as provided by law in cases of estrays, a possessory warrant to recover the animal will not lie in favor of its owner against the taker-up; but the owner is relegated to the provisions of § 2034 of the Civil Code for the recovery of his property so impounded and the determination of the relative rights arising between him and the taker-up, and the adjustment and settlement of any damages claimed by either in connection with the impounding.

Judgment reversed.

Certiorari; from Hall superior court — Judge J. B. Jones. July 26, 1911.Ed. Quillian, Luther Roberts, for plaintiff in error. W. B. Sloan, A. G. Wheeler, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.