The Supreme Court having, in answer to questions certified to it by this court, held that the municipal ordinance for the violation of which the plaintiff in error was convicted was unconstitutional, as being an unlawful interference with interstate commerce (139 Ga. 126, 76 S. E. 744), it follows that the conviction of the plaintiff in error must be set aside, and that the court erred in overruling the petition for certiorari. . Judgment reversed.